Skip to content

Fixed comment for pandas.unique #39653

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 106 commits into from
Closed

Fixed comment for pandas.unique #39653

wants to merge 106 commits into from

Conversation

Remit
Copy link
Contributor

@Remit Remit commented Feb 7, 2021

Was merged in 1.2.x as #39557

meeseeksmachine and others added 30 commits December 8, 2020 17:07
… Index.equals (always dispatchto subclass) (pandas-dev#35330)" (pandas-dev#38565)

Co-authored-by: Simon Hawkins <[email protected]>
…ValueError with Categorical columns with unused categories (pandas-dev#38612)

Co-authored-by: patrick <[email protected]>
…sphinx 3.4 + unpin sphinx (pandas-dev#38669)

Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <[email protected]>
meeseeksmachine and others added 28 commits January 17, 2021 20:50
…y ufuncs on DataFrames if not aligned + fallback to <1.2.0 behaviour (pandas-dev#39288)

Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <[email protected]>
… engine default changed (pandas-dev#39322)

Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <[email protected]>
…ements with ndarray from datetime dtype not datetime64[ns (pandas-dev#39475)

(cherry picked from commit 624621b)
Timed pd.unique vs np.unique with 1_000 and 100_000 sequences lengths. In first case np.unique was faster, whereas in the second case pd.unique won.
Hence, I propose to make the doc a bit more concrete.
@simonjayhawkins
Copy link
Member

Thanks @Remit already done in #39643

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants