-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
Add support to write simple type collections as arrays #26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Milestone
Comments
Requires #30 as |
mp911de
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 3, 2018
We now support custom conversions via R2dbcCustomConversions. Custom conversions introduces simple types that depend on the used dialect. Custom conversions and simple types are held in RelationalConverter and MappingContext. Simple types and conversions are used by DatabaseClient and repository support to properly apply registered converters and support native types such as array-columns. Related tickets: #22, #26.
schauder
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 4, 2018
We now support custom conversions via R2dbcCustomConversions. Custom conversions introduces simple types that depend on the used dialect. Custom conversions and simple types are held in RelationalConverter and MappingContext. Simple types and conversions are used by DatabaseClient and repository support to properly apply registered converters and support native types such as array-columns. Related tickets: #22, #26.
schauder
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 7, 2018
We now support custom conversions via R2dbcCustomConversions. Custom conversions introduces simple types that depend on the used dialect. Custom conversions and simple types are held in RelationalConverter and MappingContext. Simple types and conversions are used by DatabaseClient and repository support to properly apply registered converters and support native types such as array-columns. Related tickets: #22, #26. Original pull request: #31.
Done. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Postgres supports ARRAY columns that allow storing multiple values in a field. #22 allows reading these values. We need a possibility how to store these. The assumption for
Collection
-typed fields is that these values are stored using relations and not within a single column.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: