REF: DatetimeIndex.get_loc #31023
Merged
REF: DatetimeIndex.get_loc #31023
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jreback
added
Indexing
|
thanks @jbrockmendel |
|
excellent. i think that just leaves #30874 as the TDI analogue to this, then we start in on de-duplication and optimization |
3 tasks
3 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
xref #30874 which does similar cleanup for TimedeltaIndex, #31021 for PeriodIndex
Do all parsing/casting/conversion before call to self._engine or super() methods (xref #30948)
Needs test for preventing integers and Timedeltas through incorrectly.
Some of the casting may be simplified pending #30994.