-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
DOC: fix PR09,PR08 doc string errors in Timestamp, NaT, Timedelta class #28674
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This fixes Parameter {} description should finish with "." in the Timestamp class closes pandas-dev#28673
looks like the tests are failing due to:
which i am assuming means i will also need to edit the Timedelta class |
adding NaT, Timedelta class since it looks like I'll have to fix those too to get it to past the tests |
docstrings for Timestamp, NaT and Timedelta classes must match for overlapping methods. verified they now pass the test_nat.py test
confirmed that this fixes PR09 for
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for working on this, great PR. Added few minor comments, but looks good.
This fixes Parameter {} description should finish with "." in the Timestamp class closes pandas-dev#28673
docstrings for Timestamp, NaT and Timedelta classes must match for overlapping methods. verified they now pass the test_nat.py test
change ambiguous parameter to be more readable remove the period after versionadd
sorry about re-adding all the commits @datapythonista ; something was screwed up with how I had my local branch set up. should be fixed now. |
missed a few periods from the last commit also incorrectly moved a sphinx directive earlier
pandas/core/algorithms.py
Outdated
lag_indexer = tuple(lag_indexer) | ||
# To keep mypy happy, _res_indexer is a list while res_indexer is | ||
# a tuple, ditto for lag_indexer. | ||
_res_indexer = [slice(None)] * arr.ndim |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is supposed to be part of your PR. Are you sure you merged in the latest changes from upstream/master?
* DOC: Add scaling to large datasets section Closes pandas-dev#28315
apologies, i am a little confused on this one and cant figure out what im doing wrong. I ran:
but this adds more commits into the PR. let me read up on github docs and figure out what im doing and then ill take a another stab at opening a PR |
This fixes PR09,PR08 errors in Timestamp, NaT, Timedelta classes
Example:
closes #28673