Skip to content

infra: add py38 to buildspecs #1615

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 23, 2020

Conversation

metrizable
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #, if available: #1592

Description of changes:

changes include:

  • include py38 in env list for unit and release buildspecs
  • upgrade py37 to py38 and Python 3.7 to Python 3.8 in integ and local-mode buildspecs

Testing done:

unit:

...
py27: commands succeeded
py36: commands succeeded
py37: commands succeeded
py38: commands succeeded
congratulations :)

[Container] 2020/06/22 15:30:39 Running command ./ci-scripts/displaytime.sh 'py27,py36,py37,py38 unit' $start_time
=================== py27,py36,py37,py38 unit execution time ===================
5 minutes and 31 seconds
...

integs:

...
[Container] 2020/06/22 16:05:32 Running command ./ci-scripts/displaytime.sh 'py27,py38 local mode' $start_time
=================== py27,py38 local mode execution time ===================
47 minutes and 12 seconds
 
 
[Container] 2020/06/22 16:05:32 Phase complete: BUILD State: SUCCEEDED
[Container] 2020/06/22 16:05:32 Phase context status code:  Message:
[Container] 2020/06/22 16:05:32 Entering phase POST_BUILD
[Container] 2020/06/22 16:05:32 Phase complete: POST_BUILD State: SUCCEEDED
[Container] 2020/06/22 16:05:32 Phase context status code:  Message:
...

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
  • I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
  • I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
  • I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: d1e8951
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: d1e8951
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: d1e8951
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: 64c7363
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: d1e8951
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 64c7363
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@

INTEG_TEST_MONITORING_OUTPUT_BUCKET = "integ-test-monitoring-output-bucket"

FIVE_MINUTE_CRON_EXPRESSION = "cron(0/5 * ? * * *)"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 64c7363
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 64c7363
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 64c7363
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@ajaykarpur ajaykarpur changed the title feature: add py38 to buildspecs infra: add py38 to buildspecs Jun 23, 2020
@metrizable metrizable merged commit c919830 into aws:master Jun 23, 2020
@metrizable metrizable deleted the include-py38-buildspecs branch June 26, 2020 05:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants