-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Single instance testing isn't working #92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
Totktonada
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 28, 2021
Otherwise 'set' and 'register' tests, which uses synchronous spaces, fail with the 'The synchronous transaction queue doesn't belong to any instance' error. Fixes #92
Totktonada
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 29, 2021
Otherwise 'set' and 'register' tests, which uses synchronous spaces, fail with the 'The synchronous transaction queue doesn't belong to any instance' error. Fixes #92
Totktonada
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 29, 2021
Otherwise 'set' and 'register' tests, which use synchronous spaces, fail with the 'The synchronous transaction queue doesn't belong to any instance' error. Those tests did pass before the change [1] in tarantool, which was made in the scope of the issue [2]. The commit land into release branches as 2.7.2-160-g7310288fa, 2.8.1-168-g806123567, 2.9.0-221-g362e9a668. [1]: tarantool/tarantool@362e9a6 [2]: tarantool/tarantool#6034 Fixes #92
ligurio
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 2, 2021
Otherwise 'set' and 'register' tests, which use synchronous spaces, fail with the 'The synchronous transaction queue doesn't belong to any instance' error. Those tests did pass before the change [1] in tarantool, which was made in the scope of the issue [2]. The commit land into release branches as 2.7.2-160-g7310288fa, 2.8.1-168-g806123567, 2.9.0-221-g362e9a668. [1]: tarantool/tarantool@362e9a6 [2]: tarantool/tarantool#6034 Fixes #92
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
What I see on the 'jepsen-single-instance' job in tarantool (postprocessed logs):
Full logs: logs.txt.
My findings:
box.ctl.promote()
on a new leader, when RAFT is not used for leader election. It seems, even when we have just one instance. See Implement memtx transaction isolation levels for Vinyl tarantool#5522 (comment) (from this comment and below).It seems, we should add
box.ctl.promote()
afterbox.cfg()
for single instance configuration.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: