-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Fix some mistakes in the Match Types documentation #8706
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix some mistakes in the Match Types documentation #8706
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello, and thank you for opening this PR! 🎉
All contributors have signed the CLA, thank you! ❤️
Have an awesome day! ☀️
7a8f314
to
fceb470
Compare
I should note that formatting and line wrapping seems to be a bit inconsistent throughout the documentation, so I just went with a sensible default for that. If those changes are unwelcome I'm very happy to revert them and just leave the spelling / grammatical tweaks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR, besides my two comments it all LGTM!
1. Fix a few spelling and grammar errors in the match types documentation. 2. Add a comment reflecting the work to be done as part of scala#8702 so readers of the documentation do not gain a mistaken understanding of the variance rules for Match Types. 3. Wraps lines at 80 characters to enable much easier reading of the documentation in its source form. Review by @OlivierBlanvillain
fceb470
to
ba3aa8c
Compare
Fixed! Thanks for the review, and it's been great to watch all the work on match types. Is there any way I can get involved? |
Thanks! 8649 could be a good (match type related) first issue if you want to get your hands in the compiler internals |
Thanks for the pointer! I think I should have a chance to take a look at it this weekend. |
This isn't associated with any ticket, but just comes from the fact that I'm following the work on match types! It's really cool to see how they're evolving, and I'm interested in getting more involved.
Review by @OlivierBlanvillain