-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Add typeChecks to the library #6175
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
package scala.tests | ||
|
||
import scala.quoted._ | ||
import scala.tasty.Reflection | ||
|
||
object TypeChecking { | ||
|
||
inline def typeChecks(inline code: String): Boolean = ${ typeChecksImpl(code) } | ||
|
||
private def typeChecksImpl(code: String)(implicit reflect: Reflection): Expr[Boolean] = { | ||
import reflect._ | ||
typing.typeChecks(code).toExpr | ||
} | ||
|
||
} |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ | ||
import scala.tests.TypeChecking._ | ||
|
||
object Test { | ||
|
||
trait Eq[T] | ||
implicit val eq: Eq[Int] = new Eq[Int] {} | ||
|
||
implicit class AnyOps[T](x: T) { | ||
def === (y: T)(implicit c: Eq[T]) = x == y | ||
} | ||
|
||
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = { | ||
assert(typeChecks("5 === 5")) | ||
assert(!typeChecks("5.6 === 7.7")) | ||
|
||
val x: Int = 5 | ||
assert(typeChecks("x + 3")) | ||
assert(!typeChecks("y + 3")) | ||
import scala.util.Left | ||
assert(typeChecks("Left(3)")) | ||
assert(!typeChecks("Rigth(3)")) | ||
|
||
def f(x: Int): Int = x * x | ||
assert(typeChecks("f(3)")) | ||
assert(!typeChecks("g(3)")) | ||
|
||
type T | ||
assert(typeChecks("def foo(x: T): T = x")) | ||
assert(!typeChecks("foo(???)")) | ||
assert(!typeChecks("def foo(x: S): S = x")) | ||
|
||
assert(!typeChecks("def test(x: Int) =")) | ||
|
||
assert(typeChecks( | ||
""" | ||
class EqString extends Eq[String] | ||
new EqString | ||
""" | ||
)) | ||
} | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe remove
private
, as inlining will create an accessor if it's private.Can we use top-level definitions to get rid of
object TypeChecking
?Regarding
scala.tests
, what aboutscala.test
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will try the top level definition and change to
scala.test
.typeChecksImpl
must be private or it would be visible underimport scala.test
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the future, we will also support arbitrary code in top-level splices. Which will allow us to implement it like