-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
Search: remove old endpoint #7414
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't have the full context to do a good review of this, but as far as I can tell, the removal of the old endpoint looks good.
Aren't there any test cases for this endpoint that need to be removed?
Tests were changed to use the new endpoint when it was implemented. But I'll wait one more week before fulling removing this, but all docs should be pointing at the new endpoint by now. |
Did we already contact people using this endpoint and they already migrated to the new one? |
I have contacted all of them already, we decided we shouldn't wait they were using something custom or outside rtd as we never documented this api. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd like to find a better way of deprecating this for users. Is it easy to return a message/page on that URL linking to the new API? Should we 302 it and then let it fail on the JSON response differences? Not sure if there's a great answer here, but might be a more user-friendly deprecation path.
Not a blocker, but worth considering if it isn't too difficult, but probably not super important in this case.
Do you mean something like this at the django or nginx level? |
No description provided.