-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
Alter the use of RemoteRepository #2759
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
Milestone
Comments
I wish to work this issue @agjohnson, is this still open? |
This was referenced Feb 20, 2020
humitos
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 9, 2020
Initial document to discuss the path forward to implement #2759
This was done in originally #7536, and the work continued in the branch https://github.com/readthedocs/readthedocs.org/tree/remote-repository-normalization I think we can close this issue. I'm trying to target the start of data sync for next deploy. |
astrojuanlu
pushed a commit
to astrojuanlu/rtd-dev-docs
that referenced
this issue
Oct 27, 2021
Initial document to discuss the path forward to implement readthedocs/readthedocs.org#2759
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Thinking about this more,
RemoteRepository
should not be a mapping of user access to remote repository objects, but instead should be just a list of accumulated remote repository objects. There should be a secondary table that provides a many to many mapping between remote users and remote repository objects. This lets us associate a project to a GitHub repo, for example, and multiple users would get access to the project on our side.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: