Skip to content

Add notebook: case study with item response theory #181

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 3, 2021
Merged

Add notebook: case study with item response theory #181

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 3, 2021

Conversation

ltoniazzi
Copy link
Member

Description

This notebook performs data analysis of NBA foul calls with Item Response Theory. It is based on a blog post of @AustinRochford. The emphasis is on these steps:

  1. we have a real world complex problem with a sizeable dataset,
  2. so pick an “ambitious’’ model,
  3. show that is easy to instantiate it and solve it with PyMC3,
  4. and finally discover something by exploring the posteriors.

Reasons for adding to case_studies:

  • The Rasch model does not appear in the current case studies.
  • Good balance of complexity of the model versus ease of PyMC3 implementation.
  • It leaves the reader with a suggested extension of the model to experiment further.
  • Related notebooks from @AustinRochford allow readers to see this model from many different viewpoints (for example how it compares to simpler or more complex versions) on the same kind of data.

Please be aware that I am a beginner contributor.

Cheers, Lorenzo

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@chiral-carbon
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, thanks a lot for your PR! I have left 2 comments pertaining to the style used in example notebooks as pointed out in this wiki.

@ericmjl
Copy link
Member

ericmjl commented Jun 21, 2021

@OriolAbril I've personally reviewed the notebook with @ltoniazzi before, but I think it'd be good to have further comments from you and the rest of the team, at your convenience 😄.

@OriolAbril
Copy link
Member

@OriolAbril I've personally reviewed the notebook with @ltoniazzi before, but I think it'd be good to have further comments from you and the rest of the team, at your convenience smile.

👌 I probably won't have time until next week for a proper review, but if someone else can review and merge please do so, a review from me should clearly not be a blocker for the PR to be merged

@fonnesbeck fonnesbeck merged commit 0bbf199 into pymc-devs:main Jul 3, 2021
@fonnesbeck
Copy link
Member

This is a terrific addition to the repository. Thanks @ltoniazzi !

@ericmjl
Copy link
Member

ericmjl commented Jul 3, 2021

Thanks for the work, @ltoniazzi!

@ltoniazzi
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks everyone, glad to contribute!

@ltoniazzi ltoniazzi deleted the add-notebook-item-response branch July 7, 2021 13:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants