-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
CI: Add regular 3.11 pipeline #50696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 13 commits
54cff9d
b4cf4fb
88462e2
7bdb1d9
febe6e4
4364252
ce78c1d
e84c458
5a80bf4
1305cf7
ab4ea19
c19d143
62e5bf5
77eac07
7c9dc77
ff06b2b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ | ||
name: pandas-dev | ||
channels: | ||
- conda-forge | ||
dependencies: | ||
- python=3.11 | ||
|
||
# build dependencies | ||
- versioneer[toml] | ||
- cython>=0.29.32 | ||
|
||
# test dependencies | ||
- pytest>=7.0 | ||
- pytest-cov | ||
- pytest-xdist>=2.2.0 | ||
- psutil | ||
- pytest-asyncio>=0.17 | ||
- boto3 | ||
|
||
# required dependencies | ||
- python-dateutil | ||
- numpy<1.24 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can this be unpinned? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Let's check, copied 3.10 when I started but seems to work there now There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Have to keep it pinned. Numba pins it indirectly on the other jobs, but since we don't install it here, we have to keep the pin |
||
- pytz | ||
|
||
# optional dependencies | ||
- beautifulsoup4 | ||
- blosc | ||
- bottleneck | ||
- brotlipy | ||
- fastparquet | ||
- fsspec | ||
- html5lib | ||
- hypothesis | ||
- gcsfs | ||
- jinja2 | ||
- lxml | ||
- matplotlib>=3.6.1 | ||
- numexpr | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is numba commented out somewhere in this file? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. No just removed it completely, can add it as a comment if you prefer. I just left pytables in because they already released it but the conda packages are not yet build There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can you add it back as a comment so we don't forget it? Thanks. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Done |
||
- openpyxl | ||
- odfpy | ||
- pandas-gbq | ||
- psycopg2 | ||
- pymysql | ||
# - pytables>=3.8.0 # first version that supports 3.11 | ||
- pyarrow | ||
- pyreadstat | ||
- python-snappy | ||
- pyxlsb | ||
- s3fs>=2021.08.0 | ||
- scipy | ||
- sqlalchemy<1.4.46 | ||
- tabulate | ||
- tzdata>=2022a | ||
- xarray | ||
- xlrd | ||
- xlsxwriter | ||
- zstandard |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@phofl I'm confused, why comment these out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My reasoning was that it would be easier to add them back in for 3.12, but no strong opinion, can remove if you prefer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think previously we would comment/uncomment
if: false
below to temporarily disable this workflowThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah ok - that's fine, thnx for explaining