Skip to content

BUG: safe_sort losing MultiIndex dtypes #48412

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2022

Conversation

phofl
Copy link
Member

@phofl phofl commented Sep 6, 2022

  • closes #xxxx (Replace xxxx with the Github issue number)
  • Tests added and passed if fixing a bug or adding a new feature
  • All code checks passed.
  • Added type annotations to new arguments/methods/functions.
  • Added an entry in the latest doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rst file if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.

I don't think that this is user visible. This is a precursor for improving ea support in MultiIndex operations

@mroeschke mroeschke added Dtype Conversions Unexpected or buggy dtype conversions MultiIndex labels Sep 6, 2022
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 1.6 milestone Sep 6, 2022
@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit 8cb7cfe into pandas-dev:main Sep 6, 2022
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks @phofl

@phofl
Copy link
Member Author

phofl commented Oct 7, 2022

@meeseeksdev backport 1.5.x

meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/pandas that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
@phofl phofl modified the milestones: 1.6, 1.5.1 Oct 7, 2022
mroeschke pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2022
…dtypes) (#49002)

* Backport PR #48412: BUG: safe_sort losing MultiIndex dtypes

* Update algorithms.py

* Update algorithms.py

Co-authored-by: Patrick Hoefler <[email protected]>
noatamir pushed a commit to noatamir/pandas that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Dtype Conversions Unexpected or buggy dtype conversions MultiIndex
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants