Skip to content

Fix typos in 09_timeseries.rst #33226

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2020
Merged

Conversation

rogererens
Copy link
Contributor

  • closes #xxxx
  • tests added / passed
  • passes black pandas
  • passes git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff
  • whatsnew entry

@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ More details on the power of time series ``resampling`` is provided in the user
<div class="d-flex flex-row gs-torefguide">
<span class="badge badge-info">To user guide</span>

A full overview on time series is given in the pages on :ref:`time series and date functionality <timeseries>`.
A full overview on time series is given on the pages on :ref:`time series and date functionality <timeseries>`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think this one is correct as "in"

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I know, "on" is more correct here grammatically, but it sounds clunky, and we can avoid it. I would rephrase the whole thing like so:
For a full overview on time series, see :ref:time series section <timeseries> in the user guide.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @WillAyd tie breaker?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in is maybe more correct, but I don't think worth changing if its the only thing here. @AlexKirko if you want to reformat sentence separately would definitely be welcome

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

one comment, otherwise LGTM pending green

@WillAyd WillAyd added this to the 1.1 milestone Apr 2, 2020
@WillAyd WillAyd merged commit 9572a2e into pandas-dev:master Apr 2, 2020
@WillAyd
Copy link
Member

WillAyd commented Apr 2, 2020

Thanks @rogererens

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants