Skip to content

TST: tighten check_categorical=False tests #32636

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2020

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

This removes all check_categorical=False usages except for a) those in tests/util and b) a skipped json test test_latin_encoding (cc @WillAyd is that likely to be enabled in the foreseeable future?)

@WillAyd
Copy link
Member

WillAyd commented Mar 11, 2020

skipped json test test_latin_encoding (cc @WillAyd is that likely to be enabled in the foreseeable future?)

I'm not familiar with that test / background but would think not. Looks like its part of #13774 will comment there

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel added the Testing pandas testing functions or related to the test suite label Mar 11, 2020
@jreback jreback added this to the 1.1 milestone Mar 12, 2020
@jreback jreback merged commit 27ad779 into pandas-dev:master Mar 12, 2020
@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member Author

@jorisvandenbossche any objection to removing check_categorical kwarg from assert_series_equal now that we no longer use it?

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the tst-stricter-2 branch March 12, 2020 02:44
@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

@jorisvandenbossche any objection to removing check_categorical kwarg from assert_series_equal now that we no longer use it?

Yes, it's a public keyword, so needs to be deprecated first if we want to remove it.

SeeminSyed pushed a commit to CSCD01-team01/pandas that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Testing pandas testing functions or related to the test suite
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants