Skip to content

Added conda update step and re-added gcsfs #26413

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 15, 2019

Conversation

WillAyd
Copy link
Member

@WillAyd WillAyd commented May 15, 2019

@WillAyd WillAyd added the CI Continuous Integration label May 15, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 15, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #26413 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #26413      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.69%   91.68%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         174      174              
  Lines       50739    50739              
==========================================
- Hits        46524    46520       -4     
- Misses       4215     4219       +4
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 90.19% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#single 41.16% <ø> (-0.18%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py 78.94% <0%> (-10.53%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97.02% <0%> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ff4437e...1d0d6d4. Read the comment docs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 15, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #26413 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #26413      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.69%   91.68%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         174      174              
  Lines       50739    50739              
==========================================
- Hits        46524    46520       -4     
- Misses       4215     4219       +4
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 90.19% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#single 41.18% <ø> (-0.15%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py 78.94% <0%> (-10.53%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97.02% <0%> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ff4437e...8ea6aea. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Windows 37 was the problematic one right? I've verified that it's picked up gcsfs correctly.

Feel free to ignore my inline comment and just merge. I have a couple other changes I'd like to make (like including a conda env list before the test). I can do that later.

@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ jobs:
steps:
- powershell: Write-Host "##vso[task.prependpath]$env:CONDA\Scripts"
displayName: Add conda to PATH
- script: conda update -n base conda
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nitpick: it's nice to have -q here (and in the conda env create below) so that we don't have long logs just showing the download progress.

@WillAyd
Copy link
Member Author

WillAyd commented May 15, 2019

Good ideas and I think make sense to do here; just pushed a new commit with those changes

Copy link
Contributor

@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger merged commit c891431 into pandas-dev:master May 15, 2019
@martindurant
Copy link
Contributor

So the conda version alone was responsible?

@WillAyd
Copy link
Member Author

WillAyd commented May 15, 2019

I don’t think it was Conda alone but the issue is described in conda/conda#7776 if you want to read through it

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 15, 2019

pls wait in merges

this did not revert the original commit
and left over the patch in the setup script

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 15, 2019

@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor

pls wait in merges

Isn't the rule a +1 from another dev?

this did not revert the original commit
and left over the patch in the setup script

I don't see anything leftover from #26352. Can you clarify?

@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor

Ahh, looking at the wrong repo. I'll do a followup removing the extra gcsfs install.

@WillAyd
Copy link
Member Author

WillAyd commented May 15, 2019

#26384 The setup script was removed entirely in

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 15, 2019

it’s not about the +1 just more eyes

@WillAyd WillAyd deleted the conda-upgrade branch January 16, 2020 00:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI Continuous Integration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Windows 3.7 CI Failures
4 participants