-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
DOC: update the Rolling.var docstring #20233
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOC: update the Rolling.var docstring #20233
Conversation
Also updates docs for expanding window |
pandas/core/window.py
Outdated
%(name)s variance | ||
Calculate unbiased %(name)s variance. | ||
|
||
Normalized by N-1 by default. This can be changed using the ddof argument. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
single backtics around ddof
since it's a parameter.
pandas/core/window.py
Outdated
10 0.000000 | ||
11 0.000000 | ||
dtype: float64 | ||
""") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you show s.expanding(3).var(1)
as well?
pandas/core/window.py
Outdated
|
||
Parameters | ||
---------- | ||
ddof : int, default 1 | ||
Delta Degrees of Freedom. The divisor used in calculations | ||
is ``N - ddof``, where ``N`` represents the number of elements.""") | ||
is ``N - ddof``, where ``N`` represents the number of elements. | ||
args |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think the underlying function takes any additional arguments. Can remove (I think).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can remove it, it looks like it passes them through, but I didn't dive into it's usage.. I'll remove for now.
pandas/core/window.py
Outdated
Returns | ||
------- | ||
Series or DataFrame | ||
Returned object type is determined by the caller of the %(name)s |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's always the same type as the original object, right? Series.rolling().var is always a Series? Let's say that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But DataFrame.rolling().var() is a DataFrame, so that is what the above sentences tries to say. What do you want to change?
"is determined by " -> "same type as" ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice one, added some comments.
pandas/core/window.py
Outdated
%(name)s variance | ||
Calculate unbiased %(name)s variance. | ||
|
||
Normalized by N-1 by default. This can be changed using the ddof argument. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add backticks around ddof
please?
pandas/core/window.py
Outdated
-------- | ||
The below example will show a rolling example | ||
|
||
>>> s = pd.Series((5,5,5,5,6,7,9,10,5,5,5,5)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add spaces after the commas, so this passes PEP-8
pandas/core/window.py
Outdated
|
||
Examples | ||
-------- | ||
The below example will show a rolling example |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd take this sentence out, I think users will assume that.
pandas/core/window.py
Outdated
args | ||
Under Review. | ||
kwargs | ||
Under Review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
*args
and **kwargs
should have the stars. We changed the convention last minute, and the validation script is wrong, ignore the messages.
pandas/core/window.py
Outdated
|
||
Returns | ||
------- | ||
Returns the same object type as determined by the caller of the %(name)s |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would keep the Series or DataFrame
on the line above (as you had it before), that makes it clearer it is one of those.
If you use "same object type", then you can omit "as determined by" I think
pandas/core/window.py
Outdated
|
||
Examples | ||
-------- | ||
>>> s = pd.Series((5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 5, 5, 5, 5)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See comment on other PR, can you use a list here instead of tuple?
I also think it can maybe a bit shorter? Or is there something specific you want to illustrate with this exact sequence of numbers ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can do that, no specific reason why I used such a long tuple.
numpy.var : Equivalent method for Numpy array | ||
|
||
Notes | ||
----- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so in both this one and the std one, should put in the Notes that the ddof default is different than numpy. (we use 1, they use 0). This is in the Series.var/std strings already.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
pandas/core/window.py
Outdated
is ``N - ddof``, where ``N`` represents the number of elements.""") | ||
is ``N - ddof``, where ``N`` represents the number of elements. | ||
*args | ||
Under Review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was mentioned that the exact content for what should be documented for args/kwargs was to be determined. If you'd rather me add the documentation I can do that too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we're noting that they're accepted, but not used.
Thanks again @mmaybeno. |
Checklist for the pandas documentation sprint (ignore this if you are doing
an unrelated PR):
scripts/validate_docstrings.py <your-function-or-method>
git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff
python doc/make.py --single <your-function-or-method>
Please include the output of the validation script below between the "```" ticks:
If the validation script still gives errors, but you think there is a good reason
to deviate in this case (and there are certainly such cases), please state this
explicitly.