Skip to content

Conda appveyor master #18096

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor

xref conda/conda#6251

Closes #18073

@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor Author

That apparently wasn't it. (We'll still want to update to the newer miniconda though).

@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@ bottleneck
html5lib
beautifulsoup4
jinja2=2.8
moto
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Newline at end of file. Same for the 3.6 version.

@gfyoung gfyoung added the Build Library building on various platforms label Nov 3, 2017
@gfyoung gfyoung added this to the 0.21.1 milestone Nov 3, 2017
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Nov 4, 2017

That apparently wasn't it. (We'll still want to update to the newer miniconda though).

we already use the latest windows installeer, e.g. see ci/install.ps1

@@ -18,13 +18,13 @@ environment:

matrix:

- CONDA_ROOT: "C:\\Miniconda3_64"
- CONDA_ROOT: "C:\\Miniconda36_64"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this doesn't actually do anything other than create a directory for us to install into

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Nov 4, 2017

superseded by #18105

@jreback jreback closed this Nov 4, 2017
@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger deleted the conda-appveyor-master branch December 11, 2017 20:14
@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger modified the milestones: 0.21.1, No action Dec 11, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Build Library building on various platforms
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants