Skip to content

BUG: no need to validate monotonicity when groupby-rolling #15175

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jreback
Copy link
Contributor

@jreback jreback commented Jan 20, 2017

closes #15130

@jreback jreback added Bug Groupby Reshaping Concat, Merge/Join, Stack/Unstack, Explode labels Jan 20, 2017
@jreback jreback added this to the 0.20.0 milestone Jan 20, 2017
@jreback jreback closed this in 14d3a98 Jan 20, 2017
AnkurDedania pushed a commit to AnkurDedania/pandas that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2017
closes pandas-dev#15130

Author: Jeff Reback <[email protected]>

Closes pandas-dev#15175 from jreback/groupby_rolling and squashes the following commits:

5831b8e [Jeff Reback] BUG: no need to validate monotonicity when groupby-rolling
jreback added a commit to jreback/pandas that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2017
jreback added a commit to jreback/pandas that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2017
jreback added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2017
pcluo pushed a commit to pcluo/pandas that referenced this pull request May 22, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Groupby Reshaping Concat, Merge/Join, Stack/Unstack, Explode
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ERR: too strict validation on groupby.rolling with time-aware freq
1 participant