-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
WEB: Use mambaforge for the getting started installation instructions? #46793
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Agree that the benefits of mamba are clear, especially when considering the speed improvements. That being said, I feel getting started with Anaconda is still easier than mamba for most beginners. If I'm not mistaken, mamba depends on conda already being installed. At the very least, I think mamba should be added to the advanced installations page - this page also already includes miniconda instructions and outlines the size of installing via anaconda. |
|
You're right, I agree, advantages are clear so makes sense to me. |
Hi! I'm a first-time contributor and noticed this issue was still open—I'd be willing to help add mambaforge installation instructions to the advanced installations page or consider other options if we can reach a consensus on what's best. |
I didn't know about this until coming across this issue, I just did
and it worked fine - I didn't time it, but it seemed much faster Happy to have a PR @tjbai |
Mamba started using the conda solver, so this is probably not as important, as the conda solver should stop being useless for environments with several dependencies. Mamba can be downloaded from mambaforge directly, conda is not required. That's probably the best for the guide, since it's faster and simpler. I'd still be +1 on replacing conda by mambaforge, even with the conda improvement. |
We've got this page in our website, that is helping users set up a working environment to use pandas. With Anaconda moving to libmamba is probably fine to leave it as it is, but I'd personally use mambaforge in the page, which I think is probably a better choice of tool (smaller, only conda-forge channel, faster, a bit nicer UI). Does anyone think it's better to stay with Anaconda?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: