TST: Fix doctest in EngFormatter

[datapythonista]

tl;dr

Fix the next doctest error:

_________________________________________________________ [doctest] pandas.io.formats.format.EngFormatter.__call__ __________________________________________________________
1956 
1957         Formats a number in engineering notation, appending a letter
1958         representing the power of 1000 of the original number. Some examples:
1959 
1960         >>> format_eng(0)       # for self.accuracy = 0
UNEXPECTED EXCEPTION: NameError("name 'format_eng' is not defined")
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/mgarcia/miniconda3/envs/pandas-dev/lib/python3.8/doctest.py", line 1336, in __run
    exec(compile(example.source, filename, "single",
  File "<doctest pandas.io.formats.format.EngFormatter.__call__[0]>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name 'format_eng' is not defined
/home/mgarcia/src/pandas/pandas/io/formats/format.py:1960: UnexpectedException

Detailed instructions

Python allows to have example code in the documentation, like in:

def add(num1, num2):
    """
    Computes the sum of the two numbers.

    Examples
    --------
    >>> add(2, 2)
    4
    """
    return num1 + num2

In pandas, we use this to document most elements. And there are tools, like pytest,
that can run the examples, and make sure everything is correct.

For historical reasons, we have many examples where the code fails to run, or the
actual output is different from the expected output. For example, check the next
incorrect examples:

def add(num1, num2):
    """
    Computes the sum of the two numbers.

    Examples
    --------
    >>> add(2, 2)
    5

    >>> add(2, 2
    4

    >>> add(2, number)
    4

    ...
    """
    return num1 + num2

All them will fail for different reasons. To test the docstring of an object,
the next command can be run:

python -m pytest --doctest-modules pandas/core/frame.py::pandas.core.frame.DataFrame.info

Where pandas/core/frame.py is the file where the docstring is defined, and
pandas.core.frame.DataFrame.info is the object. A whole file can also be tested
by removing the :: and the object from the command above.

In general, the errors in the examples can be fixed with things like:

• Fixing a typo (a missing comma, an mispelled variable name...)
• Adding an object that hasn't been defined (like, if df is used, but
  no sample dataset df has been first defined)
• Fixing the expected output, when it's wrong
• In exceptional cases, examples shouldn't run, since they can't work.
  For example, a function that connects to a private webservice. In
  such cases, we can add # doctest: +SKIP at the end of the lines
  that should not run

To be able to properly fix an example for the first time, the next steps
are needed:

• Install a pandas development environment in your computer. There are
  simplified instructions in this page,
  and more detailed information in pandas official contributing page.
• Run the doctests for the object of interest (the one in this issue),
  and make sure the examples are still broken in the master branch of
  pandas
• Fix the file locally, and run the doctests again, to make sure the
  fix is working as expected
• Optionally have a look and make sure that the code in the examples
  follow PEP-8, and fix the style if it doesn't
• Commit your changes, push your branch to a fork, and open a pull
  request. Make sure you edit the line Closes #XXXX with the issue
  number you are addressing, so the issue is automatically closed,
  when the pull request is merged
• Make sure the continuous integration of your pull request finishes
  in green. If it doesn't, check if the problem is in your changes
  (sometimes things break in master for technical problems, and in
  that case you just need to wait for a core developer to fix the
  problem)
• Address any comment from the reviewers (just make changes locally,
  commit, and push to your branch, no need to open new pull requests)

[KrishnaSai2020]

take

[KrishnaSai2020]

@hrishikeshnikam2000 I'm sorry I have already made the fix for this issue just waiting for the pr to get merged. Please see #42705

[hrishikeshnikam2000]

@KrishnaSai2020 sorry about that. I saw that later and that's why I was deleted my comment. But I was still assigned to this issue.

[KrishnaSai2020]

Ah I see, sorry for that!