Skip to content

Skip NodeExpandVolume for block volumes #571

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2020

Conversation

saad-ali
Copy link
Contributor

@saad-ali saad-ali commented Aug 7, 2020

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespaces from that line:

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #372

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Skip NodeExpandVolume for block volumes. 

/assign @msau42

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Aug 7, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: saad-ali

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 7, 2020
return nil, status.Error(codes.InvalidArgument, fmt.Sprintf("VolumeCapability is invalid: %v", err))
}

if blk := volumeCapability.GetBlock(); blk != nil {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a unit test for this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The TestNodeExpandVolume unit tests are currently broken and require more extensive work to fix: see #573

@saad-ali
Copy link
Contributor Author

saad-ali commented Aug 7, 2020

PTAL

@msau42
Copy link
Contributor

msau42 commented Aug 7, 2020

/lgtm
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 7, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c42a52e into kubernetes-sigs:master Aug 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NodeExpand may resize fs for block volume
3 participants