-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 159
Add tests for ROX mode during Node Stage #1215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
/label tide/merge-method-squash |
/assign @leiyiz |
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
/retest |
/lgtm |
/retest pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-kubernetes-integration |
@judemars: The
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-kubernetes-integration |
Not related to your PR but recent change to
I think there should be one more file (e.g. Even when this is added same issue occurs with
Surely adding empty interfaces does not solve much but at least there are meaningful messages like "unsupported platform" instead of compile errors. |
Co-authored-by: Roman Bednář <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Roman Bednář <[email protected]>
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: judemars, leiyiz, mattcary The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
This is a follow up to #1088 which does 2 things:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #1088
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: