-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 159
read only volumes should not be expanded and we need OSS ROX testing #1088
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
read only volumes should not be expanded and we need OSS ROX testing #1088
Comments
To clarify, it is the filesystem resize that's the problem, not the volume resize? |
I'll pick this up, can someone who's a contributor please assign it to me :) |
/assign @judemars |
yes, I'll update the issue description |
Just a progress update. I think this work will have a few parts:
I have a couple outstanding questions I'm working through so posting here in case folks have any insight:
|
Update: For 3) Adding ROX k8s integration tests: go/k8spr/114628 out for review |
For (2) I'd also talk with @mauriciopoppe who has been coordinating windows support. For (1) we need to update our mount-utils in vendor/. It's a go.mod update, I'll start a discussion on our internal chat as I've been a little fuzzy on this process. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
#972 added unconditional filesystem resize and it should not happen for read only volumes. We are not seeing failures in mounting as resizing RO volume only produce an warning but this could have broken ROX functionality.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: