Allow Collection.add() to use custom objects #2607
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
February 7, 2020 14:47
thebrianchen
requested review from
Feiyang1,
hiranya911 and
hsubox76
as code owners
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #2606
One downside to this approach is if the underlying
DocumentReference.set()fails, the function name in the error message will not sayCollectionReference.add()(seeapplyFirestoreDataConverter). I thought about how to refactorset()to allow the function name to be passed down, but ultimately decided that this approach is cleaner + the developer can see the stack trace and deduce that for themselves.