Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Wire together LRU garbage collection #1392
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wire together LRU garbage collection #1392
Changes from 4 commits
dc96537
bb0c4b5
dccd058
24ac0b8
2eee12d
41b9d83
5bb58e5
18d23b6
2f242cf
d9b719b
11464ae
98ac206
71a37e7
fd2598f
ade6dc8
fdeb755
b5881cb
50a7af6
2fca6eb
f2c7f0f
a80b244
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's tempting to have an InternalPersistenceSettings type that includes cacheSizeBytes, since it looks pretty strange to have them separate, and we're always passing them together... WDYT?
The other option would be to rename persistenceSettings stuff to indexedDbPersistenceSettings or something, but I'm not really excited about that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think something like
InternalPersistenceSettings
might work. I'll do that in a separate PR against this one to see what it looks like.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR here: #1411