Skip to content

JSON output #62

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

peterschrammel
Copy link
Member

--json-ui option
and JSON output for

  • show-properties
  • show-goto-functions (currently only function list)

further TODOs:

  • show-loops
  • source location output

This was referenced Apr 8, 2016
@kroening kroening self-assigned this Apr 18, 2016
@peterschrammel peterschrammel force-pushed the json-output branch 2 times, most recently from 1c48ffc to 8344daa Compare June 9, 2016 04:44
break;

case PLAIN:
break;

default:;
default:
assert(false);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My suggestion is to remove default: statements wherever possible as the compiler will warn you about missing cases.

@tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

@peterschrammel It seems that pull request also needs rebasing before it can be merged? Thanks!

@peterschrammel peterschrammel force-pushed the json-output branch 2 times, most recently from d3be2cd to 24fd582 Compare June 9, 2016 16:53
@peterschrammel
Copy link
Member Author

I have taken into account all your comments now.

@tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @peterschrammel for all the updates! github says there are still conflicts that need resolving? (Or maybe these are new conflicts.)
On a different note, the commit includes changes to remove_unused_functions that seem unrelated to the json UI?

@peterschrammel
Copy link
Member Author

removed remove_unused_functions changes and the remaining enum-switch default

@kroening
Copy link
Member

Partially merged; note that show_goto_functions.cpp was missing.

@kroening kroening closed this Jun 17, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants