-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 274
Use goto_programt::make_X factories in goto_convert #4000
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -814,6 +814,13 @@ class goto_programt | |
return instructiont(code_returnt(), irep_idt(), l, RETURN, nil_exprt(), {}); | ||
} | ||
|
||
static instructiont make_return( | ||
code_returnt c, | ||
const source_locationt &l = source_locationt::nil()) | ||
{ | ||
return instructiont(std::move(c), irep_idt(), l, RETURN, nil_exprt(), {}); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We need to make progress on #3126, which removes all these There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Indeed! |
||
} | ||
|
||
static instructiont | ||
make_skip(const source_locationt &l = source_locationt::nil()) | ||
{ | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at the use of these, couldn't we change the approach a bit and make
goto_programt::add
be a templated function taking a variadic number of arguments, with specialisations for the various instruction types?My rationale is that we might eventually forbid to construct an
instructiont
other than via.add
, and it also saves us typinggoto_programt::
. The above would then bedest.add<SKIP>(code.source_location());
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I've been tempted by that idea. Will explore.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should be ok to merge all the
make_X
work as that does the hard work of collecting individual assignments into a single function call. Possibly moving toadd<T>(...)
is then just text transformation.