Skip to content

signature of java_object_factoryt::gen_nondet_struct_init #3743

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kroening
Copy link
Member

java_object_factoryt::gen_nondet_struct_init takes an expression as
parameter, whose type is the tag type that refers to a struct that is always
given as another parameter. The redundant parameter is removed.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

java_object_factoryt::gen_nondet_struct_init takes an expression as
parameter, whose type is the tag type that refers to a struct that is always
given as another parameter. The redundant parameter is removed.
@thk123
Copy link
Contributor

thk123 commented Jan 11, 2019

This needs a TG bump, find it hard to believe this param was added for no reason at all, but I'll wait for CI to be passing here first?

@TGWDB
Copy link
Contributor

TGWDB commented Jun 9, 2021

Closing as failed CI and lack of update for years implies this is not being looked at/addressed. If you believe this is erroneous please reopen.

@TGWDB TGWDB closed this Jun 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants