Skip to content

complete constructors for function_application_exprt #3048

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2018

Conversation

kroening
Copy link
Member

@kroening kroening commented Sep 26, 2018

Fixing a problem uncovered by PR #3045.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • My contribution is formatted in line with CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

const symbol_exprt &_function,
const argumentst &_arguments,
const typet &_type)
: binary_exprt(ID_function_application, _type) // NOLINT(runtime/explicit)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The NOLINT comment doesn't seem necessary anymore.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed.

@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the function_application_exprt-constructors branch 3 times, most recently from ec68b3b to ade7a78 Compare September 26, 2018 11:05
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR failed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: ec68b3b).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/85996359
Status will be re-evaluated on next push.
Please contact @peterschrammel, @thk123, or @allredj for support.

Common spurious failures:

  • the cbmc commit has disappeared in the mean time (e.g. in a force-push)
  • the author is not in the list of contributors (e.g. first-time contributors).

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: ade7a78).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/86003046

This fosters RIAA and avoids using the deprecated symbol_exprt() constructor.
@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the function_application_exprt-constructors branch from ade7a78 to df1ee1c Compare September 26, 2018 16:39
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: df1ee1c).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/86044590

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit b231a4f into develop Sep 26, 2018
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the function_application_exprt-constructors branch September 26, 2018 18:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants