Skip to content

sync (#63) #64

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

sync (#63) #64

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ragavvenkatesan
Copy link

When we describe a training job the data type of the hyper parameters is
lost because we use a dict[str, str]. This adds a new field to
Hyperparameter so that we can convert the datatypes at runtime.

instead of validating with isinstance(), we cast the hp value to the type it
is meant to be. This enforces a "strongly typed" value. When we
deserialize from the API string responses it becomes easier to deal with
too.

* add sagemaker cli (#32)

* add sagemaker cli

* remove unnecessary close

* address PR comments

* tidy up imports

* fix imports, flake8 errors

* improve help message for bucket-name

* remove default role name

* fix log-level and py3 tests, add copyright

* update cli example scripts

* Add documentation about BYO Models (#47)

* Add test for BYO estimator using Factorization Machines algorithm as an example. (#50)

* Support multi-part uploads (#45)

* Update TensorFlow examples following API change (#44)

* Add data_type to hyperparameters (#54)

When we describe a training job the data type of the hyper parameters is
lost because we use a dict[str, str]. This adds a new field to
Hyperparameter so that we can convert the datatypes at runtime.

instead of validating with isinstance(), we cast the hp value to the type it
is meant to be. This enforces a "strongly typed" value. When we
deserialize from the API string responses it becomes easier to deal with
too.
@iquintero iquintero deleted the ragav branch January 30, 2018 18:29
apacker pushed a commit to apacker/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant