fix: add missing Tensorflow 2.9 inference image #3251

plumdog · 2022-07-19T11:38:34Z

Issue #, if available: #3250

Description of changes:

Add the missing Tensorflow 2.9 inference image.

Note that I'm considering this to be a "fix", not a "feature" as the training image for 2.9 is in and released, but the inference image is missing, so I think this is a bug.

There might well be some automation or script or something that can do this, but I believe I, as an end user, don't have the ability to list all images in a repository, so this is just based of my finding that I can pull tensorflow-inference:2.9.0-cpu (and can't pull tensorflow-inference:2.9.1-cpu).

Testing done:

$ aws ecr get-login-password --region eu-west-1 | docker login --username AWS --password-stdin "763104351884.dkr.ecr.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com"
Login Succeeded
$ docker pull 763104351884.dkr.ecr.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/tensorflow-inference:2.9.0-cpu                                                    
2.9.0-cpu: Pulling from tensorflow-inference
...
$ docker pull 763104351884.dkr.ecr.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/tensorflow-inference:2.9-cpu
2.9-cpu: Pulling from tensorflow-inference
...
$ docker pull 763104351884.dkr.ecr.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/tensorflow-inference:2.9.0-gpu
2.9.0-gpu: Pulling from tensorflow-inference
...
$ docker pull 763104351884.dkr.ecr.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/tensorflow-inference:2.9-gpu
2.9-gpu: Pulling from tensorflow-inference
...

So 2.9 and 2.9.0 exist in both cpu and gpu formats, in the eu-west-1 registries, at least.

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backword compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-19T11:40:24Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
Commit ID: 35426df
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-19T11:40:26Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
Commit ID: 35426df
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-19T11:41:45Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
Commit ID: 35426df
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-19T11:53:32Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
Commit ID: 35426df
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

codecov-commenter · 2022-07-19T11:55:12Z

Codecov Report

Merging #3251 (e0274dc) into master (284ddbe) will decrease coverage by 0.79%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3251      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.82%   89.03%   -0.80%     
==========================================
  Files         645      203     -442     
  Lines       55518    18275   -37243     
==========================================
- Hits        49871    16271   -33600     
+ Misses       5647     2004    -3643

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...s/sagemaker/tensorflow/training_compiler/config.py
...py37/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sagemaker/logs.py
...agemaker/model_monitor/clarify_model_monitoring.py
...lib/python3.7/site-packages/sagemaker/vpc_utils.py
...n3.7/site-packages/sagemaker/wrangler/ingestion.py
...python3.7/site-packages/sagemaker/xgboost/model.py
...lib/python3.8/site-packages/sagemaker/estimator.py
...8/lib/python3.8/site-packages/sagemaker/_studio.py
.../site-packages/sagemaker/workflow/callback_step.py
.../py38/lib/python3.8/site-packages/sagemaker/job.py
... and 838 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-19T12:11:58Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
Commit ID: 35426df
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-19T12:49:13Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
Commit ID: 9cafeb0
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-19T12:49:26Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
Commit ID: 9cafeb0
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-19T12:49:29Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
Commit ID: 9cafeb0
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-19T13:14:36Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
Commit ID: 9cafeb0
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-19T14:57:36Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
Commit ID: 9cafeb0
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-27T23:51:02Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
Commit ID: 8fdeda4
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-27T23:58:33Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
Commit ID: 8fdeda4
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-28T00:12:45Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
Commit ID: 8fdeda4
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-28T00:24:15Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
Commit ID: 8fdeda4
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-28T00:34:52Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
Commit ID: 8fdeda4
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-28T01:24:53Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
Commit ID: 8fdeda4
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-28T01:42:07Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
Commit ID: 8fdeda4
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-07-28T01:47:57Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
Commit ID: 8fdeda4
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-08-01T23:53:25Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
Commit ID: 8fdeda4
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-08-02T00:10:46Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
Commit ID: 8fdeda4
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-08-02T01:47:14Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
Commit ID: 8fdeda4
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

plumdog · 2022-08-02T09:12:33Z

@kevinyang8 @navinsoni I think this change is still required, but some of the tests are still failing. I think this is because the training image version is 2.9.1, but the inference version I'm adding is 2.9.0. However, no training image 2.9.0 exists, and no inference image 2.9.1 exists, and the SDK (or the tests) assume that matching images will exist.

sagemaker-python-sdk/src/sagemaker/image_uri_config/tensorflow.json

Line 1501 in 7d30d8c

"2.9": "2.9.1"

Training image 2.9.1 does exist:

$ docker pull "$(python -c 'import sagemaker; print(sagemaker.image_uris.retrieve(framework="tensorflow", region="us-west-2", version="2.9.1", image_scope="training", instance_type="ml.t3.medium"))')"
2.9.1-cpu-py39: Pulling from tensorflow-training
d7bfe07ed847: Already exists 
223cc3730ba4: Downloading [>                                                  ]  538.2kB/233.6MB
...

But training image 2.9.0 does not. It's not set in the SDK's image uris:

$ python -c 'import sagemaker; print(sagemaker.image_uris.retrieve(framework="tensorflow", region="us-west-2", version="2.9.0", image_scope="training", instance_type="ml.t3.medium"))'                                                                   [1]
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: Unsupported tensorflow version: 2.9.0. You may need to upgrade your SDK version (pip install -U sagemaker) for newer tensorflow versions. Supported tensorflow version(s): 1.10.0, 1.11.0, 1.12.0, 1.13.1, 1.14.0, 1.15.0, 1.15.2, 1.15.3, 1.15.4, 1.15.5, 1.4.1, 1.5.0, 1.6.0, 1.7.0, 1.8.0, 1.9.0, 2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, 2.0.4, 2.1.0, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.2.0, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.3.0, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, 2.4.1, 2.4.3, 2.5.0, 2.5.1, 2.6.0, 2.6.2, 2.6.3, 2.7.1, 2.8.0, 2.9.1, 1.10, 1.11, 1.12, 1.13, 1.14, 1.15, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9.

And it doesn't exist in the source ECR repos:

$ docker pull "$(python -c 'import sagemaker; print(sagemaker.image_uris.retrieve(framework="tensorflow", region="us-west-2", version="2.9.1", image_scope="training", instance_type="ml.t3.medium"))' | sed 's/2\.9\.1/2.9.0/')"
Error response from daemon: manifest for 763104351884.dkr.ecr.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/tensorflow-training:2.9.0-cpu-py39 not found: manifest unknown: Requested image not found

And the CI failure I'm seeing looks like:

=================================== FAILURES ===================================
__________ test_deploy_with_input_handlers[ml.p3.2xlarge-2.9.0-2.9.1] __________
[gw264] linux -- Python 3.9.13 /codebuild/output/src599037907/src/github.com/aws/sagemaker-python-sdk/.tox/py39/bin/python

sagemaker_session = <sagemaker.session.Session object at 0x7f9ffbf98c10>
instance_type = 'ml.p3.2xlarge', tf_full_version = '2.9.0'
tf_full_py_version = 'py39'

    def test_deploy_with_input_handlers(
        sagemaker_session, instance_type, tf_full_version, tf_full_py_version
    ):
        estimator = TensorFlow(
            entry_point="training.py",
            source_dir=TFS_RESOURCE_PATH,
            role=ROLE,
            instance_count=1,
            instance_type=instance_type,
            framework_version=tf_full_version,
            py_version=tf_full_py_version,
            sagemaker_session=sagemaker_session,
            tags=TAGS,
        )
    
>       estimator.fit(job_name=unique_name_from_base("test-tf-tfs-deploy"))

tests/integ/test_tf.py:308: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
.tox/py39/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sagemaker/workflow/pipeline_context.py:209: in wrapper
    return run_func(*args, **kwargs)
.tox/py39/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sagemaker/estimator.py:1006: in fit
    self.latest_training_job = _TrainingJob.start_new(self, inputs, experiment_config)
.tox/py39/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sagemaker/estimator.py:1893: in start_new
    train_args = cls._get_train_args(estimator, inputs, experiment_config)
.tox/py39/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sagemaker/estimator.py:1980: in _get_train_args
    train_args["image_uri"] = estimator.training_image_uri()
.tox/py39/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sagemaker/estimator.py:2962: in training_image_uri
    return image_uris.get_training_image_uri(
.tox/py39/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sagemaker/image_uris.py:504: in get_training_image_uri
    return retrieve(
.tox/py39/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sagemaker/workflow/utilities.py:197: in wrapper
    return func(*args, **kwargs)
.tox/py39/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sagemaker/image_uris.py:154: in retrieve
    version = _validate_version_and_set_if_needed(version, config, framework)
.tox/py39/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sagemaker/image_uris.py:326: in _validate_version_and_set_if_needed
    _validate_arg(version, available_versions + aliased_versions, "{} version".format(framework))
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

arg = '2.9.0'
available_options = ['1.10.0', '1.11.0', '1.12.0', '1.13.1', '1.14.0', '1.15.0', ...]
arg_name = 'tensorflow version'

    def _validate_arg(arg, available_options, arg_name):
        """Checks if the arg is in the available options, and raises a ``ValueError`` if not."""
        if arg not in available_options:
>           raise ValueError(
                "Unsupported {arg_name}: {arg}. You may need to upgrade your SDK version "
                "(pip install -U sagemaker) for newer {arg_name}s. Supported {arg_name}(s): "
                "{options}.".format(arg_name=arg_name, arg=arg, options=", ".join(available_options))
            )
E           ValueError: Unsupported tensorflow version: 2.9.0. You may need to upgrade your SDK version (pip install -U sagemaker) for newer tensorflow versions. Supported tensorflow version(s): 1.10.0, 1.11.0, 1.12.0, 1.13.1, 1.14.0, 1.15.0, 1.15.2, 1.15.3, 1.15.4, 1.15.5, 1.4.1, 1.5.0, 1.6.0, 1.7.0, 1.8.0, 1.9.0, 2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, 2.0.4, 2.1.0, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.2.0, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.3.0, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, 2.4.1, 2.4.3, 2.5.0, 2.5.1, 2.6.0, 2.6.2, 2.6.3, 2.7.1, 2.8.0, 2.9.1, 1.10, 1.11, 1.12, 1.13, 1.14, 1.15, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9.

So the test is trying to train with TF 2.9.0, and the SDK doesn't know about an image for that, and indeed none exists in the ECR repos. I think the tests are trying to run with 2.9.0 because this PR adds a 2.9.0 inference image.

To summarise (in us-west-2, repo 763104351884.dkr.ecr.us-west-2.amazonaws.com, and found the same results in eu-west-1):

TF version	scope	image	known by SDK?	exists in ECR?
2.9	inference	`tensorflow-inference:2.9-cpu`	✔️*	✔️
2.9.0	inference	`tensorflow-inference:2.9.0-cpu`	✔️*	✔️
2.9.1	inference	`tensorflow-inference:2.9.1-cpu`	❌	❌
2.9	training	`tensorflow-training:2.9-cpu-py39`	✔️	✔️
2.9.0	training	`tensorflow-training:2.9.0-cpu-py39`	❌	❌
2.9.1	training	`tensorflow-training:2.9.1-cpu-py39`	✔️	✔️

(* = "added to the SDK by this PR")

Some questions/thoughts:

What assumptions do the tests (or maybe the SDK more generally) make about version numbers between training and inference images?
- Is it that if version X has as a training image then it is assumed to also have an inference image? This would make some sense, but I don't this can be the case as CI passed on feature: Adding Training Compiler support for TensorFlow estimator starting TF 2.9 #3156
- Is it that if version X has as an inference image then it is assumed to also have a training image? This appears to be the case and I think is why CI is failing on this PR.
Why does Tensorflow image 2.9.1 exist for training but not for inference? Is this a bug (ie because for any training image there should be an exact version number match inference image and vice-versa?) or is this expected (ie because the patch version number doesn't really matter and is actually more like a build number?)?
What should happen next? I don't think I can fix this just by making changes to the image uri config file. I think one of the following is needed:
- If image tags between training and inference are expected to match exactly, need for new image(s) to be pushed to the repositories. Probably a tensorflow-inference:2.9.1-cpu to be pushed to the repo in each region, and then I update the PR. I expect this option is the right one.
- If image tags between training and inference are not expected to match exactly, need to make changes to this SDK (or just to the tests) to not make this assumption so that CI passes. I expect this option is not the right one.

plumdog · 2022-08-02T09:27:54Z

Aha:

sagemaker-python-sdk/tests/conftest.py

Lines 380 to 392 in 6f72e3c

    
           @pytest.fixture(scope="module") 
        
           def tf_full_version(tensorflow_training_latest_version, tensorflow_inference_latest_version): 
        
               """Fixture for TF tests that test both training and inference. 
        
               Fixture exists as such, since TF training and TFS have different latest versions. 
        
               Otherwise, this would simply be a single latest version. 
        
               """ 
        
               return str( 
        
                   min( 
        
                       Version(tensorflow_training_latest_version), 
        
                       Version(tensorflow_inference_latest_version), 
        
                   ) 
        
               )

That assumes that the the minimum of the two latest versions for training and inference will exist. So, in this case, is finding 2.9.1 for training, 2.9.0 for inference and assuming that 2.9.0 will exist for both, but it does not.

So the tests need a version that exists for both. So need do one of

"backfill" the training image by pushing a 2.9.0.
release an inference 2.9.1 image
rework the tests and the SDK to handle a mismatch between the TF versions
rework that test fixture to add in "if the minimum of the two versions is 2.9.0, actually return 2.9"

sagemaker-bot · 2022-08-02T19:20:20Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
Commit ID: f47e3f3
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-08-02T19:23:09Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
Commit ID: f47e3f3
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-09-23T22:50:03Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
Commit ID: e0274dc
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-09-23T23:03:59Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
Commit ID: e0274dc
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-09-23T23:19:59Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
Commit ID: e0274dc
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-09-23T23:27:22Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
Commit ID: e0274dc
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-09-24T00:49:24Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
Commit ID: e0274dc
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-09-29T00:07:48Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
Commit ID: 7e59f82
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-09-29T00:25:02Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
Commit ID: 7e59f82
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-09-29T00:32:15Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
Commit ID: 7e59f82
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-09-29T00:46:50Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
Commit ID: 7e59f82
Result: SUCCEEDED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

sagemaker-bot · 2022-09-29T01:15:56Z

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
Commit ID: 7e59f82
Result: FAILED
Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

plumdog · 2022-11-11T18:03:26Z

Superseded by #3465

plumdog force-pushed the issue-3250-add-missing-tf-2.9-inference-image branch from 35426df to 9cafeb0 Compare July 19, 2022 12:47

plumdog force-pushed the issue-3250-add-missing-tf-2.9-inference-image branch from 9cafeb0 to 8fdeda4 Compare July 25, 2022 07:04

mufaddal-rohawala added the external_contributor Contributor is a non AWS employee. label Jul 27, 2022

navinsoni requested a review from saimidu July 28, 2022 17:04

kevinyang8 approved these changes Aug 1, 2022

View reviewed changes

navinsoni approved these changes Aug 1, 2022

View reviewed changes

plumdog force-pushed the issue-3250-add-missing-tf-2.9-inference-image branch from f7ff2df to e0274dc Compare August 9, 2022 23:17

plumdog and others added 3 commits September 24, 2022 09:38

fix: add missing Tensorflow 2.9 inference image

d53f5d5

Attempt a hack to handle missing 2.9.0 training image in tests

582d2d5

This is Python, not Typescript

7e59f82

plumdog force-pushed the issue-3250-add-missing-tf-2.9-inference-image branch from e0274dc to 7e59f82 Compare September 24, 2022 08:38

plumdog closed this Nov 11, 2022

plumdog deleted the issue-3250-add-missing-tf-2.9-inference-image branch November 11, 2022 18:03

plumdog restored the issue-3250-add-missing-tf-2.9-inference-image branch November 11, 2022 18:03

plumdog deleted the issue-3250-add-missing-tf-2.9-inference-image branch November 11, 2022 18:03

plumdog restored the issue-3250-add-missing-tf-2.9-inference-image branch November 11, 2022 18:03

navinsoni self-assigned this Nov 16, 2022

fix: add missing Tensorflow 2.9 inference image #3251

fix: add missing Tensorflow 2.9 inference image #3251

Conversation

plumdog commented Jul 19, 2022

Merge Checklist

General

Tests

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

codecov-commenter commented Jul 19, 2022 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 27, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 27, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 28, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 28, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 28, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 28, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 28, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Jul 28, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Aug 1, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Aug 2, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Aug 2, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

plumdog commented Aug 2, 2022 • edited Loading

plumdog commented Aug 2, 2022

sagemaker-bot commented Aug 2, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Aug 2, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Sep 23, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Sep 23, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Sep 23, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Sep 23, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Sep 24, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Sep 29, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Sep 29, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Sep 29, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Sep 29, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

sagemaker-bot commented Sep 29, 2022

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

plumdog commented Nov 11, 2022

codecov-commenter commented Jul 19, 2022 •

edited

Loading

plumdog commented Aug 2, 2022 •

edited

Loading