Skip to content

lazy_segment_tree.py-static-type-checking #2303

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 12 commits into from
Closed

lazy_segment_tree.py-static-type-checking #2303

wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

kanthuc
Copy link
Contributor

@kanthuc kanthuc commented Aug 13, 2020

Describe your change:

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

@TravisBuddy
Copy link

Hey @kanthuc,
Something went wrong with the build.

TravisCI finished with status errored, which means the build failed because of something unrelated to the tests, such as a problem with a dependency or the build process itself.

View build log

TravisBuddy Request Identifier: c686fa70-dd23-11ea-b6e2-493429cddfc3

@spamegg1
Copy link
Contributor

1 E741 ambiguous variable name 'l'
4 F821 undefined name 'List'

You can rename l to something longer. Also use from typing import List.

@TravisBuddy
Copy link

Hey @kanthuc,
Something went wrong with the build.

TravisCI finished with status errored, which means the build failed because of something unrelated to the tests, such as a problem with a dependency or the build process itself.

View build log

TravisBuddy Request Identifier: 7f59b910-e0f4-11ea-a6dd-d374b9ca78b0

@@ -2,21 +2,23 @@


class SegmentTree:
def __init__(self, N):
def __init__(self, N: int) -> None:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is N in uppercase? Uppercase is reserved for constants in Python naming. Could we come up with a more self-documenting name than a single character?

self.N = N
self.st = [
self.st: List[int] = [
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is st? Why does the reader have to guess? Can't we come up with a more self-documenting name?

self.lazy: List[int] = [
0 for i in range(0, 4 * N)
] # create array to store lazy update
self.flag: List[int] = [0 for i in range(0, 4 * N)] # flag for lazy update
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What exactly are we flagging with this variable? This type hint is not required. The typing system can already figure out that a list comprehension creates a list and that 0 is an int. This type hint just creates cognitive clutter for the reader.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, the changes I made in this pr were already included in pr#2329 which was merged recently, so I closed this pr. I'll make these changes separately and send out a new pr. Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants