-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
Fixed a bug where nullable enum like classes could not be deserialized correctly #564
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ | ||
using System; | ||
using FluentAssertions; | ||
using OmniSharp.Extensions.DebugAdapter.Client; | ||
using OmniSharp.Extensions.DebugAdapter.Protocol; | ||
using OmniSharp.Extensions.DebugAdapter.Protocol.Models; | ||
using OmniSharp.Extensions.DebugAdapter.Protocol.Requests; | ||
using Xunit; | ||
|
||
namespace Dap.Tests | ||
{ | ||
public class EnumLikeConverterTests | ||
{ | ||
[Fact] | ||
public void PathFormat_Should_Be_Serializable() | ||
{ | ||
var options = new InitializeRequestArguments() { | ||
PathFormat = PathFormat.Uri | ||
}; | ||
|
||
Action a = () => new DapSerializer().SerializeObject(options); | ||
a.Should().NotThrow(); | ||
} | ||
[Fact] | ||
public void PathFormat_Should_Be_Deserializable() | ||
{ | ||
Action a = () => new DapSerializer().DeserializeObject<InitializeRequestArguments>("{\"pathformat\": \"Uri\"}"); | ||
a.Should().NotThrow(); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we get something like
PathFormat?
(implying the value can benull
), we could see anull
fromreader.Value
I assume.I would have expected the serialiser to return
null
in that circumstance rather thannew PathFormat(null)
.But also, if we do get a
PathFormat?
, we can't promise a non-nullableIEnumLikeString
but rather I would have guessed we need to returnIEnumLikeString?
.So in the
realType
branch, I would have expected something like:Does that make sense? Or is there something else going on here that makes that not a concern?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that sounds correct, I'll update the pattern