Skip to content

chore: update the interactive create descriptions based on the DevRel feedback. #4013

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2018

Conversation

DimitarTachev
Copy link
Contributor

PR Checklist

Related to #3969

@DimitarTachev DimitarTachev force-pushed the tachev/improve-create-readme branch from 8e27688 to e8b7759 Compare October 11, 2018 07:55
@@ -85,12 +85,12 @@ describe("Project commands tests", () => {
answers["First, what will be the name of your app?"] = opts.projectNameAnswer;
}
if (opts.flavorAnswer) {
const flavorQuestion = opts.projectNameAnswer ? "Next" : "First" + ", which flavor would you like to use?";
const flavorQuestion = opts.projectNameAnswer ? "Next" : "First" + ", which style of NativeScript project would you like to use:";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do you need + here?

const flavorQuestion = opts.projectNameAnswer ? "Next" : "First, which style of NativeScript project would you like to use:";

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy-paste :)

@DimitarTachev DimitarTachev force-pushed the tachev/improve-create-readme branch from e8b7759 to 747449e Compare October 11, 2018 08:21
@DimitarTachev DimitarTachev merged commit 8069439 into master Oct 11, 2018
@DimitarTachev DimitarTachev deleted the tachev/improve-create-readme branch October 11, 2018 09:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants