Skip to content

Execute tests when we need no coverage #91

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2025

Conversation

szepeviktor
Copy link
Contributor

@szepeviktor szepeviktor commented Apr 14, 2025

Oh no!
Unit tests were not running when not generating coverage.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 14452675932

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 98.564%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 14450158551: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 3295
Relevant Lines: 3343

💛 - Coveralls

@wol-soft wol-soft merged commit 6b2d4df into wol-soft:master Apr 15, 2025
7 checks passed
@wol-soft
Copy link
Owner

whoops 😄 Should've had a more in depth look before merging. Thanks for noticing and patching!

@szepeviktor szepeviktor deleted the patch-1 branch April 15, 2025 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants