feat: export class names as an ESM #336
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains a:
Motivation / Use-Case
Closes #43.
Consuming class names as an ESM with named exports makes Webpack to include them as separate bindings, which in turn, allows minifires to mangle them or inline those class names.
It all leads to a reduced size of a bundle, which, in case of our app, was
~30Kib
of a minified code.Breaking Changes
This a backward-compatible change due to an interoperability between ESM and CJS implemented in Webpack.
Additional Info
Tests weren't updated because none of them assert exports of JS modules. Unfortunately, I've no idea how it can be tested given the existing cases.