Skip to content

feat: add command execution again #74

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2021

Conversation

wagoid
Copy link
Owner

@wagoid wagoid commented Feb 7, 2021

Related to #70

As mentioned on actions/toolkit#702 (comment),
we are safe to execute commands on our side.

This reverts commit 58072cd, reversing
changes made to 1788ebd.
@wagoid wagoid force-pushed the feat/add-command-execution-again branch from 6a0df16 to a34ac47 Compare February 7, 2021 10:21
@wagoid wagoid merged commit 51f76f1 into master Feb 7, 2021
@wagoid wagoid deleted the feat/add-command-execution-again branch February 7, 2021 10:26
Copy link
Collaborator

@jdbruijn jdbruijn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even though it is already merged, thought I'd share this minor comment.

LGTM, just a minor comment.

@@ -135,9 +134,7 @@ const showLintResults = async ([from, to]) => {
)
const formattedResults = formatErrors(lintedCommits)

// disable workflow commands
const token = uuidv4()
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The uuidv4 dependency can be removed from this file, also as npm package if it is not used elsewhere.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch! I see it's been even updated on #76, will merge that one. It's also about time to add eslint to this project, will add later on 😃

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants