Skip to content

Warn when component option should be an object, but is not (#5605) #5642

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 12, 2017

Conversation

maciej-ka
Copy link
Contributor

#5605

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update
  • Refactor
  • Build-related changes
  • Other, please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

The PR fulfills these requirements:

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

  • A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

Other information:

@@ -148,8 +148,14 @@ function getData (data: Function, vm: Component): any {
const computedWatcherOptions = { lazy: true }

function initComputed (vm: Component, computed: Object) {
if (!isPlainObject(computed)) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You should refactor this block into a function and add the check there too so it is stripped when bundling:

process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production' && checkOptionType(vm, 'computed')

@@ -24,4 +24,11 @@ describe('Options methods', () => {
})
expect(`method "hello" has an undefined value in the component definition`).toHaveBeenWarned()
})

it('should warn non object', () => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These tests can also be refactored into a function. It should also test it doesn't print the warning in the right scenario

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should refactored function be a separate file in test/helpers/?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, after all you need to include it in different test files 🙂

@@ -60,6 +60,17 @@ const isReservedProp = {
slot: 1
}

function parseObjectOption (vm: Component, option: Object, name: string) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no need for option arg because you have name

vm
)
}
computed = parseObjectOption(vm, computed, 'computed')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This must be called only in non-production env (NODE_ENV !== 'production')

@@ -60,6 +60,17 @@ const isReservedProp = {
slot: 1
}

function parseObjectOption (vm: Component, option: Object, name: string) {
if (!isPlainObject(option)) {
process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production' && warn(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

since this function is only called in dev mode, this check is unecessary

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it may be good to provide a fallback (empty object) if a wrong type is used in prod mode

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, because it will never reach production code

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The check must be removed in production

@@ -60,6 +60,17 @@ const isReservedProp = {
slot: 1
}

function parseObjectOption (vm: Component, option: Object, name: string) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

better call it checkOptionType

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the result is used in assignment, to call it a "check" may be misleading

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The assignment prevents runtime errors but the function is meant to do a check

const option = vm.$options[name]
if (!isPlainObject(option)) {
warn(
`${name} should be an object.`,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The message could be a bit more explicit: component option "${name}" should be an object

@yyx990803 yyx990803 merged commit d6bd667 into vuejs:dev May 12, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants