We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
vue/component-tags-order
vue/block-order
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We use the word "block" in rule names to refer to the top-level tags in Vue SFCs:
vue/block-lang
vue/block-tag-newline
vue/no-empty-component-block
vue/no-restricted-block
However, the vue/component-tags-order rule does not fit that schema. I suggest to rename the rule to vue/block-order:
Are there other rules for which it would make sense to rename them for consistency and/or clarity?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
vue/padding-line-between-blocks => vue/newline-between-blocks vue/padding-line-between-tags => vue/newline-between-tags vue/padding-lines-in-component-definition => vue/newlines-in-component-definition
vue/padding-line-between-blocks
vue/newline-between-blocks
vue/padding-line-between-tags
vue/newline-between-tags
vue/padding-lines-in-component-definition
vue/newlines-in-component-definition
"newline" is more intuitive and easier to search on the rules page.
Sorry, something went wrong.
But it matches the core padding-line-between-statements rule name, so I'd rather not change them.
padding-line-between-statements
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
We use the word "block" in rule names to refer to the top-level tags in Vue SFCs:
vue/block-lang
vue/block-tag-newline
vue/no-empty-component-block
vue/no-restricted-block
vue/no-restricted-block
However, the
vue/component-tags-order
rule does not fit that schema. I suggest to rename the rule tovue/block-order
:vue/block-order
as a copy ofvue/component-tags-order
and deprecate the latter.vue/component-tags-order
completely.Are there other rules for which it would make sense to rename them for consistency and/or clarity?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: