-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unsafe-return] don't reiterate through all type parts for each part #10203
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unsafe-return] don't reiterate through all type parts for each part #10203
Conversation
Thanks for the PR, @tezf! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
✅ Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit a704014. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution ✅ Successfully ran 2 targetsSent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #10203 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 86.16% 86.18% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 430 430
Lines 15031 15055 +24
Branches 4361 4368 +7
==========================================
+ Hits 12951 12975 +24
Misses 1728 1728
Partials 352 352
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh! Nice catch 👏
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me as well. Just wondering if there's a way to regression test for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for fixing this!
PR Checklist
Overview
Prevents the whole type from being looped through
isThenableType
once for each part of the type.