Skip to content

Cherrypick rgeos removal from description #5453

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

teunbrand
Copy link
Collaborator

Because {rgeos} is going to be retired and we want to include the spatial retirements into the release.

@teunbrand teunbrand requested a review from thomasp85 October 4, 2023 15:25
Copy link
Member

@thomasp85 thomasp85 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - is this really the only place it is referenced

@teunbrand
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yes, it was a 'ghost' suggested package, because no code actually used it.

@teunbrand teunbrand merged commit 3f2eac4 into tidyverse:v3.4.4-rc Oct 9, 2023
teunbrand added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2023
* Cherry-pick from #5327

* Add a NEWS item

* Hotfix 3.4.4 (#5449)

* is.atomic() --> is.atomic() || is.null()

* Polish news

* Put is.null() first

* Cherrypick rgeos removal from description (#5453)

* Remove rgeos from the dependency (#5242)

---------

Co-authored-by: Hiroaki Yutani <[email protected]>

* run revdepcheck

* Update CRAN comments

* Increment version number to 3.4.4

* Fix Version 3.4.4 NEWS Typo (#5479)

Change "the upcoming retirement of rproj, rgeos, and maptools"
to "the upcoming retirement of rgdal, rgeos, and maptools"

* Increment version number to 3.4.4.9000

---------

Co-authored-by: Hiroaki Yutani <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Lin Pedersen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Matt Nield <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants