Skip to content

chore: fix updated ESLint rules #188

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2020
Merged

Conversation

nickserv
Copy link
Member

I noticed these build errors in #182 but realized they aren't the fault of that PR. It seems like some ESLint dependency update has introduced new failing rules, so I've fixed them.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 28, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #188 (b1ed206) into master (75e0111) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #188   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines          100       100           
  Branches        35        35           
=========================================
  Hits           100       100           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 75e0111...b1ed206. Read the comment docs.

@nickserv nickserv merged commit 3dbb1c2 into master Nov 28, 2020
@nickserv nickserv deleted the fix-updated-eslint-rules branch November 28, 2020 15:09
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 5.6.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 8, 2022

🎉 This PR is included in version 6.6.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants