Skip to content

fix: correct consistent-data-testid docs example #146

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2020

Conversation

jeffrifwald
Copy link
Contributor

I just noticed the docs don't have the correct rule name here as I was having some trouble getting it to work.

Copy link
Member

@timdeschryver timdeschryver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @jmcriffey !

@timdeschryver timdeschryver merged commit 8065cc3 into testing-library:master May 29, 2020
@Belco90
Copy link
Member

Belco90 commented May 29, 2020

Thanks guys!

@Belco90
Copy link
Member

Belco90 commented May 29, 2020

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.1.4 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@Belco90
Copy link
Member

Belco90 commented May 29, 2020

This should be a doc PR type rather than fix to avoid releasing a new package tho. Not a big deal anyway.

@Belco90
Copy link
Member

Belco90 commented May 29, 2020

@all-contributors please add @jmcriffey for doc

@allcontributors
Copy link
Contributor

@Belco90

I've put up a pull request to add @jmcriffey! 🎉

@Belco90
Copy link
Member

Belco90 commented May 29, 2020

@all-contributors please add @gndelia for review

@allcontributors
Copy link
Contributor

@Belco90

I've put up a pull request to add @gndelia! 🎉

@timdeschryver
Copy link
Member

Ah got it @Belco90 , I'll try to remember it for next time + the contributors bot :)

@Belco90
Copy link
Member

Belco90 commented May 29, 2020

No problem. I guess I should add this to contributing guidelines or somewhere else?

@timdeschryver
Copy link
Member

I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I guess it can't hurt to add it (or later if it happens too many times)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants