Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 14, 2022. It is now read-only.

Umbrella issue for mutation support #142

Closed
Totktonada opened this issue May 11, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Umbrella issue for mutation support #142

Totktonada opened this issue May 11, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
archived enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@Totktonada
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Totktonada Totktonada added enhancement New feature or request prio1 labels May 11, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 22, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 23, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 27, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 28, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 28, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 28, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 28, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 28, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 28, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 28, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 29, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 29, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 29, 2018
Totktonada added a commit that referenced this issue May 30, 2018
Forbid passing "insert", "update" or "delete" with each other in an one
argument list.

Part of #142.
@Totktonada
Copy link
Member Author

Mutation PoC was implemented in PR #145. Insert, update and delete are supported.

There are backlog issues, the list is below.

  • implement replace
  • count mutation requests in statistics
  • subrecord (args generation) -- see comment for add_extra_arguments()
  • perform atomic mutations -- aupdate and so on? other rules for shown
    result and other constraints; use q_* operations to give some guarantees?
    • can we provide a request metainfo to give user know whether it is
      transactional?

They will be extracted to other issues that will have a link the this one.

@Totktonada
Copy link
Member Author

Sinked down to prio2 as subrecord and other complex schemas mutation was implemented (#166, PR #168).

@Totktonada Totktonada added prio2 and removed prio1 labels Jun 17, 2018
@Totktonada Totktonada added wontfix This will not be worked on archived and removed prio2 labels Apr 13, 2022
@Totktonada
Copy link
Member Author

I'm going to archive the repository. I'll proceed as follows:

  • Mark all open pull requests with the archived label and close.
  • Mark all open issues with archived and wontfix labels and close.
  • Archive the repository.

Consider the following projects:

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant