Solving Issue/datajdbc-1099

[mipo256]

This PR fFixes #1099 bug. Jens @schauder, can you, please, review these changes?

[schauder]

Thanks, that's polished and merged.

[vab2048]

Did this eventually actually get merged? I still cannot see a schema parameter for the @Table annotation. This would make specifying the schema much easier.

[ZeroOne3010]

@vab2048 It is there now: 😃

spring-data-relational/spring-data-relational/src/main/java/org/springframework/data/relational/core/mapping/Table.java

Lines 52 to 61 in 4a8b185

	/**
	* Name of the schema (or user, for example in case of oracle), in which this table resides in
	* The behavior is the following: <br/>
	* If the {@link Table#schema()} is specified, then it will be
	* used as a schema of current table, i.e. as a prefix to the name of the table, which can
	* be specified in {@link Table#value()}. <br/>
	* If the {@link Table#schema()} is not specified, then spring data will assume the default schema,
	* The default schema itself can be provided by the means of {@link NamingStrategy#getSchema()}
	*/
	String schema() default "";

I'm also eagerly awaiting a release with this improvement.