-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 356
PGobject is not considered a simple type. It was before. #1778
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
It was only removed for R2DBC since the PG* types are part of the JDBC driver and therefore not present for R2DBC. Please provide a Minimimal Reproducable Example, preferable as a Github repository. Make sure to include the database, either as an in memory database or if that is not possible using Testcontainers. |
@schauder
|
The problem is that the simpleTypes from the dialect don't get registered with the Instead overwrite |
Warning i oppstart er: Registering converter from class to class org.postgresql.util.PGobject as writing converter although it doesn't convert to a store-supported type; You might want to check your annotation setup at the converter implementation Løsning kommer fra diskusjon spring-projects/spring-data-relational#1778
…rt (#171) Warning i oppstart er: Registering converter from class to class org.postgresql.util.PGobject as writing converter although it doesn't convert to a store-supported type; You might want to check your annotation setup at the converter implementation Løsning kommer fra diskusjon spring-projects/spring-data-relational#1778
Converters using PGobject logs warnings
Warning message:
It seems it was added as a Simple type and then removed in this commit. Was that intended?
879984d#diff-39643143ab2d0d7185fb6f633054e28a2804ba993e1ae9e4e7311bdcabae7190L158
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: