Skip to content

Support ASYNC/SYNC flush modes for flushDb() and flushAll() #2187

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
schnapster opened this issue Oct 30, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

Support ASYNC/SYNC flush modes for flushDb() and flushAll() #2187

schnapster opened this issue Oct 30, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement

Comments

@schnapster
Copy link
Contributor

See https://redis.io/commands/flushdb and https://redis.io/commands/flushall

FLUSHDB:

  • Both modes are supported since Redis v1.0.0

FLUSHALL:

  • ASYNC since v4.0.0
  • SYNC since v6.2.0

On a cursory glance, it also appears that both Lettuce and Jedis support these modifiers already.

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Oct 30, 2021
schnapster added a commit to schnapster/spring-data-redis that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2021
schnapster added a commit to schnapster/spring-data-redis that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2021
@christophstrobl christophstrobl added type: enhancement A general enhancement and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Nov 8, 2021
@mp911de mp911de linked a pull request Nov 9, 2021 that will close this issue
4 tasks
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2022
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2022
Update since tags. Move FlushOption converters to client-specific converters. Use method-references where possible.

See #2187
Original pull request: #2190.
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2022
Update since tags. Move FlushOption converters to client-specific converters. Use method-references where possible.

See #2187
Original pull request: #2190.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants