Skip to content

Save and update relationships in batches #2593

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
meistermeier opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Closed

Save and update relationships in batches #2593

meistermeier opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@meistermeier
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement
Milestone
6.3.3 (2021.2.3)

Comments

@meistermeier
Copy link
Collaborator

At the moment SDN updates relationships in single steps.
Move the logic into an UNWIND operation and provide a list of relationships to persist or update.
This is right now excluding dynamic properties because they have to get grouped.
Also this focusses on imperative operation only for now.

PS: Creating a new issue because this one is not related to #2588 (<-- is a bug).
@meistermeier meistermeier added the type: enhancement A general enhancement label Sep 14, 2022
@meistermeier meistermeier added this to the 6.3.3 (2021.2.3) milestone Sep 14, 2022
@meistermeier meistermeier self-assigned this Sep 14, 2022
meistermeier added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2022
@meistermeier
GH-2593 - Move relationship updates to batch operations.
82c92b3 
This change explicitly excludes:
- All reactive operations
- Dynamic relationships

Closes #2593
@meistermeier meistermeier mentioned this issue Sep 14, 2022
Open
@michael-simons michael-simons mentioned this issue Jan 4, 2023
Closed
4 tasks
@justodiaz justodiaz mentioned this issue Feb 7, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@meistermeier meistermeier

Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
6.3.3 (2021.2.3)
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@meistermeier