Skip to content

DATAMONGO-2003 - Fix derived query using regex pattern with options. #570

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

christophstrobl
Copy link
Member

We now consider regex Pattern options when using the Pattern as a derived finder argument.

We now consider regex pattern options when using the pattern as a derived finder argument.
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2018
We now consider regex pattern options when using the pattern as a derived finder argument.

Original pull request: #570.
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2018
Remove superfluous throws declarations and trailing whitespaces.

Original pull request: #570.
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2018
We now consider regex pattern options when using the pattern as a derived finder argument.

Original pull request: #570.
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2018
Add nullability annotation to MongoParameterAccessor.getPoint(). Remove superfluous casts.

Convert MongoQueryCreatorUnitTests to user AssertJ assertions.

Original pull request: #570.
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2018
We now consider regex pattern options when using the pattern as a derived finder argument.

Original pull request: #570.
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2018
Add nullability annotation to MongoParameterAccessor.getPoint(). Remove superfluous casts.

Convert MongoQueryCreatorUnitTests to user AssertJ assertions.

Original pull request: #570.
@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Jun 11, 2018

That's merged, polished, and backported now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants